Joey Porter's Pit Bulls don't feel particularly optimistic about the Steelers' game vs. the Houston Texans on Sunday, but ... this is the kind of game the Steelers win.
It's tough to feel all too good about this game, however, as the Texans view this is as a Statement Game at home. It seems every Steelers' opponent views their match-up with Pittsburgh that way, as a Statement Game, to prove they are just as physically rough-and-tumble as the Steelers.
The trouble is, some of them (Baltimore anyway) are proving to be right. And, as much as Houston's identity on offense is as a high-flying aerial show (they lead the NFL with pass completions of more than 20 yards), their attack is basically ground-based and a successful one at that, averaging 138 yards a game and more than four yards per rushing attempt.
The Steelers must stop the run. It's as simple as that. Last year, stopping the run wasn't even really a question, at an NFL-record 62 yards per game. This year, pheh, stopping the run appears to have become a bit more of a challenge. The Texans have one of the NFL's best offensive lines clearing lanes for a powerful one-two punch in Arian Foster, last year's NFL rushing leader, and Ben Tate, who is averaging 4.6 yards per carry this year.
It would be nice, too, if the Steelers established their own running game with authority. Y'know, pound the rock, control the clock, keep Matt Schaub and Andre Johnson off the field. Oh, and lest it not be overlooked, running the ball effectively just might help protect the health of our $102 million quarterback, Ben Roethlisberger.
Since 2006, after all, Roethlisberger has taken the most sacks -- by far -- in the NFL. Roethlisberger has taken a whopping 230 sacks since 2006. Donovon McNabb is a distant second with 168 sacks taken -- a disparity of 62 sacks between the two. It's not even close. Running the ball successfully should reduce some of those hits on Big Ben.
Oh, and by the way, Defense, would it be too much to ask for a turnover or three?
Comments are welcome, below left.
No comments:
Post a Comment